Verify Opposing Counsel's Filings

Don't take their arguments at face value. Verify every citation.

They're Counting on You Not Checking

When opposing counsel files a motion packed with citations, the sheer volume can feel overwhelming. Especially if you're pro se or a small firm without a Westlaw subscription. That's the point. A stack of authoritative-looking citations is designed to make you think resistance is futile.

But here's what we discovered first-hand: citations that look bulletproof often aren't. Real case names, real reporters - but when you actually read the opinions, they have nothing to do with the arguments being made. Statutes that exist but apply to completely different situations. The citations are there to impress, not to inform.

Real story: During settlement negotiations, opposing counsel handed us printouts of individual cases she was citing - the case law she was using to pressure us into settling. We ran them through ADP. Not a single one actually supported her argument. The cases were real. They existed. But they had nothing to do with our situation. She was banking on the fact that we wouldn't check.

Level the Playing Field

ADP doesn't care whose document it is. Upload their motion, their brief, their response - every citation gets the same treatment. Verified against authoritative Florida sources. Checked for applicability to the actual legal issues.

In minutes, you'll know which of their citations are verified, which don't exist, and which might be real but don't actually support the argument they're using them for. That's the information you need to draft an effective response.

What You Get

Free summary - how many of their citations verify, how many don't, how many have applicability concerns. Enough to know whether you should dig deeper.

Verification Report - citation-by-citation breakdown with verification status, source links, and the document context where each citation appears.

Deep Analysis - multiple independent AI models assess whether each citation actually supports the argument it's cited for. If it doesn't, ADP suggests alternative authorities that actually address the legal issue - ones you can use in your response.